ISLAMABAD: A startling revelation has once again highlighted India’s deep involvement in destabilizing Pakistan through proxy terrorism.

Former Corps Commander Quetta Lt Gen (R) Aamir Riaz has disclosed a brazen 2007 incident where an Indian diplomat attempted to funnel funds directly to the banned Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA).

This episode underscores a pattern of state-sponsored interference that Pakistan has long warned the world about.

The Indian official, later identified as a RAW officer stationed at the embassy in Pakistan, was granted permission to travel by road.

During this journey, he tried to deliver a massive $400,000 to BLA handlers operating within the country.

Pakistani authorities caught him red-handed, thwarting the covert operation.

Lt Gen (R) Aamir Riaz’s disclosure brings fresh attention to multiple pieces of evidence Pakistan has accumulated over years.

Indian intelligence has consistently funded BLA through direct agents and routes via Afghanistan.

Such actions represent not isolated events but a systematic campaign against Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Pakistan’s armed forces have time and again demonstrated exceptional vigilance in countering these threats.

Their intelligence-led operations have neutralized numerous attempts to sow chaos in Balochistan.

The 2007 catch was no accident but the result of sharp monitoring by Pakistan’s security apparatus.

This incident forms part of a larger dossier of proofs shared with the United Nations and major global powers.

Pakistan has presented irrefutable documentation showing RAW’s financial pipelines to BLA operatives.

These funds often flow through Afghan territories before reaching militants inside Pakistan.

BLA activities have targeted critical infrastructure, including projects vital for regional connectivity and economic growth.

Yet Pakistan Army’s resolute defense has protected national interests against such external aggression.

Lt Gen (R) Aamir Riaz, with his extensive experience commanding in Quetta, witnessed these patterns firsthand.

His revelations align with earlier statements where he described Indian spy activities as an unconventional war declaration.

Pakistan’s military leadership has repeatedly exposed how Indian handlers exploit regional instabilities.

In one documented case, RAW channeled resources to create unrest specifically in resource-rich Balochistan.

The $400,000 attempt in 2007 was substantial enough to finance multiple terror modules.

Such sums highlight the scale of investment India makes in anti-Pakistan elements.

Global observers have received detailed briefings on these funding trails.

Evidence includes financial transactions, handler communications, and confessions from captured operatives.

Pakistan’s proactive sharing of intelligence reflects its commitment to regional peace and stability.

Despite this transparency, Indian interference continues through various proxies.

The Pakistan Army’s counter-terrorism successes in Balochistan stand as testament to its professional excellence.

Troops have conducted precise operations, dismantling networks backed by foreign powers.

Balochistan’s people increasingly reject BLA’s violent agenda, thanks to development initiatives supported by the state.

CPEC projects symbolize this progress, bringing infrastructure and opportunities despite sabotage attempts.

Indian agencies view these developments as threats to their regional designs.

Hence, the focus on disrupting peace through funded militancy.

Lt Gen (R) Aamir Riaz emphasized multiple evidences confirming direct Indian support.

RAW officers embedded in diplomatic covers have been a recurring feature in these operations.

The 2007 diplomat’s road travel permission was a routine facilitation that backfired spectacularly.

It exposed the dual role many Indian embassy staff play in Pakistan.

Security agencies maintain constant surveillance on suspicious movements.

This particular interception prevented immediate terror financing that could have fueled attacks on civilians and forces.

Pakistan has faced numerous challenges from such externally sponsored groups.

Yet the armed forces’ dedication ensures the nation’s defense remains impregnable.

International forums have been apprised of these facts repeatedly.

Dossiers submitted to the UN detail names, transactions, and operational links.

The world community must take note of this consistent pattern of hybrid warfare.

Pakistan’s evidence trail spans years, with the 2007 case as a key exhibit.

RAW’s strategy involves not just funding but also training and arming through safe havens.

Afghanistan has served as a conduit in many such instances.

Pakistani intelligence has tracked these movements with remarkable accuracy.

The bravery and professionalism of Pakistan’s defenders deserve global recognition.

They stand as a bulwark against forces seeking to fragment the country.

Balochistan’s security situation has improved significantly due to sustained military efforts.

Local populations benefit from enhanced connectivity and economic projects.

Attempts to derail this progress through BLA receive no popular support.

The 2007 incident reveals the desperation in Indian tactics.

Delivering cash directly via a diplomat shows high-risk, high-reward thinking.

But Pakistan’s alertness turned it into a major embarrassment.

Lt Gen (R) Aamir Riaz’s account adds authoritative weight to these claims.

As a former top commander, his words carry immense credibility.

Pakistan continues to gather and share more proofs as new incidents emerge.

The international community faces a choice in addressing this sponsorship of terrorism.

Ignoring facts only emboldens perpetrators of instability.

Pakistan Army remains fully prepared to defend every inch of the motherland.

Their sacrifices ensure that foreign designs against Pakistan fail repeatedly.

This episode from 2007 is a reminder of enduring threats.

Yet it also highlights the enduring strength and vigilance of Pakistan’s institutions.

Future implications remain serious as long as such proxy support persists.

Will the world finally hold accountable those fueling terrorism across borders?

The answer lies in concrete global action against state sponsors.