ISLAMABAD: Trump administration officials have expressed skepticism over Pakistani mediators’ assessments of Iran’s position in ongoing US-Iran talks, describing them as “more positive” than the reality on the ground, according to CNN.
Pakistani officials, including Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, have played a central role in facilitating back-channel communications between Washington and Tehran following the US-Israeli strikes on Iran and subsequent regional escalation that began in late February 2026.
The mediation efforts gained momentum after a fragile ceasefire was announced in early April. Islamabad has hosted multiple rounds of proximity talks, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visiting the capital for consultations.
According to two Trump administration officials cited by CNN, the White House received upbeat feedback from Pakistani channels indicating Iranian progress toward compromise on key issues, including the Strait of Hormuz and nuclear-related matters.
However, US sources cautioned that previous talks had collapsed at the final stage and viewed Islamabad’s optimism with reserve.
Pakistani diplomatic sources maintain that their assessments are based on direct engagements with Iranian leadership and reflect genuine movement in Tehran’s stance. Officials in Islamabad have reiterated commitment to impartial facilitation aimed at achieving a durable ceasefire and long-term memorandum to end hostilities.
The talks focus on reopening the Strait of Hormuz for international shipping, addressing Iran’s nuclear program, and establishing mechanisms to prevent future escalation. Oil prices have surged significantly since the closure of the strategic waterway, impacting global energy markets.
**Background on Pakistan’s Role**
Pakistan emerged as an unlikely but active mediator due to its longstanding diplomatic ties with both Washington and Tehran. Field Marshal Asim Munir has held multiple engagements with US officials, while Pakistan maintains geographic and historical connections with Iran.
In recent weeks, senior Pakistani figures have shuttled messages between the two sides. Iran has used Pakistani channels to convey responses to US proposals, including the latest offer reviewed in early May.
**Aircraft Controversy**
Separately, a CBS News report claimed that Iran parked military aircraft, including an RC-130 reconnaissance variant, at Pakistan’s Nur Khan Airbase near Rawalpindi shortly after the April ceasefire announcement. US officials suggested this may have been to shield assets from potential strikes.
Pakistan’s Foreign Office categorically rejected the allegations as “misleading and sensationalised,” stating that any Iranian aircraft presence was linked to diplomatic and security requirements for the talks and bore no connection to military contingencies.
The episode has fueled questions in some US circles about the neutrality of Pakistan’s mediation, with calls from certain quarters to review Islamabad’s role. Pakistani officials have dismissed such suggestions and affirmed continued support for peace efforts.
**Economic and Regional Context**
The US-Iran conflict has already caused significant economic disruption. Global oil prices rose sharply following Iranian actions in the Strait of Hormuz, adding pressure on energy-importing economies including Pakistan. Successful mediation could help stabilise markets and reduce inflationary risks across South Asia.
Analysts note that Pakistan’s involvement carries both diplomatic prestige and strategic risks. A breakthrough would enhance Islamabad’s international standing, while any perception of bias could strain ties with Washington at a time when economic cooperation remains a priority.
**Strategic Implications**
As negotiations continue, the coming days are expected to test the effectiveness of Pakistani facilitation. US officials have emphasised the need for concrete Iranian concessions, while Tehran seeks assurances on sanctions relief and security guarantees.
Pakistan has indicated it will persist in its bridging role, with further high-level contacts anticipated. The outcome of these efforts could influence not only regional stability but also broader US engagement patterns in South and West Asia.
Future developments hinge on whether differences can be narrowed before any ceasefire extension deadlines. Islamabad continues to coordinate with both capitals as diplomatic activity remains intense.