ISLAMABAD: The International Cricket Council has issued stern warnings tothe Pakistan Cricket Board regarding potential severe sanctions shouldPakistan decide to boycott the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 in solidaritywith Bangladesh’s exclusion from the tournament. Sources indicate thatpenalties could encompass suspension of bilateral series, exclusion fromthe Asia Cup, and denial of No Objection Certificates for overseas playersin the Pakistan Super League. This escalation follows PCB Chairman MohsinNaqvi’s criticism of the ICC’s handling of Bangladesh’s case, labeling itas double standards, with the final decision resting with the federalgovernment.
The controversy intensified when the Bangladesh Cricket Board refused toparticipate in matches hosted in India, citing security concerns amplifiedby the release of fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman from the Kolkata KnightRiders squad in the Indian Premier League. After failed negotiations torelocate Bangladesh’s fixtures to Sri Lanka, the ICC replaced them withScotland, drawing sharp rebuke from Pakistan. Naqvi highlightedinconsistencies, noting that Pakistan-India matches in previous events hadbeen shifted to neutral venues like Colombo, yet similar accommodationswere denied to Bangladesh.
PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi has publicly stated that Pakistan’s participationhinges on governmental directives, with consultations ongoing involvingPrime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Reports suggest Naqvi informed players ofthe uncertainty, emphasizing that the PCB rejects perceived inequities inICC decision-making. This stance has reportedly irked the ICC, promptingwarnings of unprecedented measures to safeguard tournament integrity andprevent further disruptions ahead of the February 7 commencement in Indiaand Sri Lanka.
If Pakistan withdraws, the ICC could impose comprehensive isolation,including barring bilateral cricket with other nations and withholding NOCsessential for foreign talent in the PSL, a key revenue source for the PCB.Exclusion from the Asia Cup would further limit competitive exposure andfinancial inflows. Such actions aim to deter challenges to ICC authority,particularly as the 20-team event approaches with high stakes for globalcricket viewership and sponsorships.
Pakistan’s Group A schedule features matches against the Netherlands onFebruary 7 in Colombo, the USA on February 10, India on February 15 at R.Premadasa Stadium, and Namibia on February 18. All Pakistan fixtures areallocated to Sri Lankan venues due to longstanding bilateral sensitivities.A boycott might see Uganda elevated as replacement, altering group dynamicsand potentially diminishing the tournament’s appeal without thehigh-profile India-Pakistan clash.
Former Pakistan captain Rashid Latif has advocated for solidarity withBangladesh, arguing that a joint withdrawal could force negotiations andexpose governance flaws. He suggested that Pakistan’s absence would renderthe event akin to a diminished league, reducing global interestsignificantly. However, PCB sources indicate awareness of the high costs,with no official withdrawal declared despite speculative reports.
The ICC’s position underscores efforts to maintain schedule sanctity andequity among members, rejecting claims of bias. Bangladesh’s exit stemmedfrom prolonged deadlocked talks, with the BCB’s security argumentsunpersuasive despite regional precedents. Pakistan’s vocal support haspositioned it as a key player in this diplomatic cricketing impasse,balancing national solidarity against international repercussions.
Broader implications include strained relations within Asian cricket,potential shifts in future event planning, and questions over venueneutrality protocols. The ICC’s hybrid models in past tournaments forPakistan highlight flexibility precedents that critics argue should extendregionally. As consultations proceed, the outcome may redefineparticipation norms and influence stakeholder dynamics in world cricketgovernance.
The situation remains fluid, with Pakistan’s government expected to provideclarity soon. Withdrawal risks long-term isolation for Pakistan cricket,impacting player development, league viability, and international standing.Conversely, participation under current terms might preserve relations butfuel domestic criticism over perceived capitulation. The cricketingfraternity watches closely as this unfolds, with ramifications extendingbeyond the T20 World Cup.
Source:https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/icc-threat-pakistan-sanctions-t20-world-boycott-asia-cup-exclusion-10493245
Cricket
ogimageimage-name
