ISLAMABAD: The United States Department of State has implemented an indefinite pause on issuing immigrant visas to nationals from 75 designated countries, effective January 21, 2026, citing the need to safeguard American taxpayers from potential financial burdens posed by incoming immigrants. This directive, communicated through official channels and social media by the State Department and White House, underscores President Donald Trump’s longstanding emphasis that immigrants must demonstrate financial self-sufficiency and avoid becoming reliant on public welfare programs. The policy revives and expands the public charge doctrine, which has historically barred entry to those likely to depend primarily on government aid for subsistence. Critics argue the measure disproportionately impacts legal immigration from developing regions, while supporters view it as essential fiscal protection.
The affected countries span multiple continents, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Brazil, Iran, Russia, Somalia, Egypt, Iraq, Haiti, Syria, and numerous others in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, and Asia. This list, totaling exactly 75 nations, was publicly detailed on the State Department’s website following the January 14 announcement. Notably, the suspension applies solely to immigrant visas processed at US consulates abroad, allowing applicants to proceed with submissions and consular interviews but halting final visa issuance. Dual nationals holding passports from unaffected countries remain exempt, providing a limited workaround for some families.
The rationale centers on the public charge ground of inadmissibility, enshrined in US immigration law for over a century. Under this provision, consular officers assess factors such as age, health, education, employment prospects, financial resources, and English proficiency to determine future reliance on benefits. A November 2025 internal cable reportedly expanded scrutiny to include considerations like mental health conditions and obesity, broadening discretion for denials. The Trump administration has framed the pause as a temporary measure pending a full reassessment of regulations and guidance to prevent welfare utilization by newcomers from high-risk nationalities.
Data from prior fiscal years highlights the potential scale of impact. Nationals from these 75 countries accounted for a substantial portion of immigrant visas issued in recent periods, with estimates suggesting nearly half of all family- and employment-based green cards originated from similar regions. Analyses indicate the policy could reduce overall legal immigration by 33 to 50 percent over the administration’s term, potentially blocking 1.5 to 2.4 million entrants through combined measures including this pause, refugee admission cuts, and Diversity Visa restrictions. Such projections stem from overlapping enforcement actions that prioritize economic self-reliance. US Immigration Analysts quotimg the sources have claimed that the suspension ban is likely to stay for Atleast 12 months and may exceed to 24 months as the nationals from 75 countries are involved and the number of immigrants visa exceed hundreds of thousands and scrutiny would required a long time.
Implementation began amid broader immigration enforcement efforts in Trump’s second term, including reinforced border security and revised public charge interpretations proposed in 2025. The State Department emphasized that the freeze aligns with presidential directives requiring immigrants to contribute positively without extracting resources from American taxpayers. While nonimmigrant categories remain unaffected, the indefinite nature of the suspension has raised concerns about family reunification delays, particularly for spouses, children, and parents of US citizens or permanent residents abroad.
Reactions vary sharply along political lines. Proponents, including administration officials, argue the step protects public resources and upholds the principle that immigration should benefit the host nation economically. Opponents, including advocacy groups and some analysts, contend the policy lacks empirical justification for blanket country-based restrictions and risks discriminatory application. They point to existing safeguards, such as five-year bars on most means-tested benefits for new immigrants, and census data showing low welfare participation among legal entrants overall. US State Department has clarified through a tweet on USA Urdu Twitter Account that the suspension will remain enforce till the time US administration ensures that the future and current immigrants don’t become a burden for US economy and don’t use American government funds for welfare purposes.
Read Top Stories
The pause has immediate repercussions for pending cases, with consular posts instructed to refrain from printing visas during the review period. This could exacerbate backlogs in family reunification and skilled worker categories, affecting global mobility and US economic ties with the listed nations. As the administration conducts its policy overhaul, observers anticipate further tightening of admissibility criteria, potentially incorporating stricter affidavits of support or enhanced documentation requirements.
In the context of evolving US immigration strategy, this development represents a significant escalation in legal pathway restrictions. It builds on earlier proclamations targeting national security and public safety threats, now pivoting toward economic considerations. The long-term effects on bilateral relations, remittances, and diaspora communities remain uncertain, but the measure signals a continued focus on prioritizing American interests in immigration decisions.