Pakistan may boycott ICC T20 World Cup in India if Bangladesh withdraws

Pakistan may boycott ICC T20 World Cup in India if Bangladesh withdraws

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Cricket Board is contemplating a potential boycottof the upcoming ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 if Bangladesh ultimatelydecides against participation due to unresolved security concerns in India.Reports indicate that PCB officials have paused national team preparationsamid escalating diplomatic tensions, highlighting solidarity with theBangladesh Cricket Board’s stance on player safety. This developmentfollows the ICC’s firm rejection of relocating Bangladesh’s group-stagematches from Indian venues to Sri Lanka, despite appeals citing heightenedrisks. The situation underscores ongoing geopolitical strains in SouthAsian cricket, where reciprocal security demands have repeatedly disruptedtournament schedules.

The controversy traces back to Bangladesh’s formal request to shift itsfour group fixtures, scheduled in Mumbai and Kolkata, away from India. TheBCB cited advice from the Bangladesh government and growing safety worriesfor players, officials, and staff following recent political shifts andperceived threats. Multiple security assessments commissioned by the ICC,including independent reviews, concluded that threats remained nil tonegligible at Indian venues. In a board meeting, 14 of 16 members votedagainst relocation, with only Pakistan and Bangladesh in support,emphasizing the ICC’s commitment to maintaining schedule integrity andneutrality in global events.

Pakistan’s response has been marked by strong diplomatic backing forBangladesh. PCB sources described the concerns as reasonable and valid,drawing parallels to India’s earlier refusal to travel to Pakistan for the2025 Champions Trophy, which led to a hybrid model with Indian matchesrelocated to Dubai. This precedent has fueled arguments within PCB circlesthat inconsistent application of security protocols undermines fairness.While no official boycott threat has been issued, officials noted thatunresolved issues could prompt reconsideration of participation, thoughPakistan’s matches are already set for neutral Sri Lanka venues under prioragreements.

Speculation about a full withdrawal gained traction through media reportsand social platforms, with some outlets suggesting Pakistan might haltpreparations entirely. However, senior PCB insiders clarified that outrightboycott remains unlikely, as the board lacks grounds for such action givenits neutral hosting arrangement. Bangladesh’s potential non-participationcould force the ICC to nominate a replacement team, further complicatinglogistics just weeks before the tournament’s start. The standoff hasexposed deeper governance challenges within the ICC, particularly inbalancing member interests amid regional politics.

Former players and analysts have weighed in, with some criticizing the ICCfor perceived bias toward revenue-generating nations. The situation echoespast disputes, including the 2023 ODI World Cup and Asia Cup hybrid models,where political considerations influenced cricketing decisions.Bangladesh’s firm position, reiterated by government advisers that the teamwill not travel under current conditions, adds pressure on the ICC to finda resolution without setting damaging precedents for future events.

As the deadline for Bangladesh’s confirmation looms, the PCB’s supportiveletter to the ICC signals closer alignment between the two boards followingrecent political changes in Dhaka. This emerging partnership could reshapeSouth Asian cricket dynamics, offering Pakistan greater leverage in ICCdeliberations. Meanwhile, preparations for the T20 World Cup continue underuncertainty, with stakeholders urging dialogue to preserve the tournament’ssanctity and ensure equitable treatment for all participants.

The broader implications extend beyond bilateral ties, raising questionsabout how security perceptions and geopolitical realities intersect withinternational sport governance. Cricket authorities face the challenge ofupholding event credibility while addressing legitimate member concerns inan increasingly polarized region.

ogimageimage-name