ISLAMABAD: The brief but intense military confrontation between India andPakistan in May 2025, known as Operation Sindoor, reached a dramaticturning point when a single telephone call from Pakistan’s Director Generalof Military Operations altered the course of events. What began as India’sprecision strikes in response to a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgamescalated into exchanges across land, air, and sea domains. On May 10,Pakistan’s DGMO contacted his Indian counterpart at 15:35 hours, conveyingcritical information that shifted the dynamics toward an immediateceasefire by 17:00 hours. This hotline communication highlighted the roleof advanced intelligence capabilities in preventing further escalationbetween the two nuclear-armed neighbours.
The roots of the conflict trace back to the April 22, 2025, terroristattack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 26civilians, mostly tourists. India attributed the assault to Pakistan-basedmilitant groups Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba, accusing Islamabad ofsupporting cross-border terrorism. In retaliation, India launched OperationSindoor on May 7, conducting missile and drone strikes on alleged terrorinfrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The operationmarked one of the most significant Indian military actions against targetsin Pakistan since 1971, demonstrating enhanced precision and technologicalsuperiority in non-contact warfare.
As the conflict intensified over four days, both sides engaged inairstrikes, drone intrusions, and missile exchanges, raising fears of abroader conventional war.Indian forces claimed successful targeting of nineterror hubs without initial losses, while Pakistan reported interceptingnumerous drones and neutralizing Indian Figher jets threats. The rapid paceof military actions underscored vulnerabilities in air defence systems andthe growing importance of real-time intelligence in modern conflicts.
A pivotal revelation emerged recently when Indian Army Chief GeneralUpendra Dwivedi disclosed during a January 2026 press conference thatPakistan possessed comprehensive satellite-based surveillance capabilities.This intelligence provided detailed, real-time visibility into Indianmilitary deployments, including warships, strike corps movements, andaircraft positions. The information reportedly shocked Indian assessments,exposing limitations in concealment despite extensive preparations forpotential ground operations. Such transparency influenced strategiccalculations on both sides.
The DGMO hotline, a longstanding mechanism for crisis communication, provedinstrumental in de-escalation. Pakistan’s military leadership, armed withprecise data from satellite reconnaissance—likely augmented throughpartnerships—initiated the call to convey the gravity of their awareness.This move demonstrated information superiority’s power to compel restraintwithout further kinetic engagement. The conversation resulted in a mutualagreement to halt all hostilities across multiple domains, with provisionsfor follow-up discussions to ensure the truce’s longevity.
Defence analysts note that satellite intelligence has become a decisivefactor in South Asian security dynamics. During the conflict, commercialand possibly allied sources enabled persistent monitoring, reducing theelement of surprise in conventional manoeuvres. India’s response includedreleasing time-stamped satellite imagery to verify strike accuracy, whileacknowledging the challenges posed by adversary capabilities in space-baseddomains. This episode highlights the need for enhanced counter-intelligenceand space resilience measures.
Read Top Stories
The ceasefire agreement held despite initial accusations of violations,allowing commercial activities and normalcy to resume gradually.International actors, including the United States, monitored developmentsclosely, though both nations emphasized the bilateral nature of themilitary dialogue. The absence of nuclear rhetoric in DGMO exchangescontrasted with political statements, reinforcing the hotline’s stabilizingrole in high-tension scenarios.
Operation Sindoor’s outcome reflects evolving doctrines in the region,where precision strikes and intelligence dominance shape conflicttrajectories. The phone call underscored how shared awareness ofcapabilities can avert catastrophe. As both militaries review lessons fromthe episode, the focus remains on deterrence, communication channels, andtechnological parity to maintain fragile peace.
ogimageimage-name
