ChatGPT
On Thursday, the former Prime Minister and current PTI Chairman, ImranKhan, took a stance against the annulment of his bails by theanti-terrorism courts (ATCs) by presenting a challenge before the LahoreHigh Court (LHC), as reported by 24NewsHD TV channel.
In light of this development, the PTI chairman initiated legal action bysubmitting seven distinct petitions, each pertaining to separate cases.Within these petitions, Imran Khan named the ATC judge, along with therespondents being the Gulberg police station and the Sarwar Road policestation.
However, the court deferred the hearing of these applications to a laterdate, specifically September 4th, thereby declining to entertain them onthe present occasion.
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) was the forum where Sher Afzal Marwat, thelegal representative of the former Prime Minister, and PTI Chairman ImranKhan, presented his argument. Marwat contended that cases falling under thepurview of the Official Secrets Act should rightfully be addressed by amagistrate’s court rather than an anti-terrorism court, and he highlightedthis during the hearing.
Read Top Stories
Furthermore, during the proceedings concerning the cipher case beingconducted within Attock Jail, Marwat requested the court to issue acorresponding notice.
In his interaction with the Chief Justice (CJ) of the IHC, Aamer Farooq,Marwat underscored that two primary objections had been raised against hisclient’s petition. He elucidated that one of these objections centeredaround the multiplicity of requests made within a single application,raising complexities around legal procedure.
Overall, Imran Khan’s challenge against the cancellation of his bails andthe ensuing legal actions have brought to light significant debatessurrounding the jurisdiction of courts in cases related to nationalsecurity, ultimately prompting discussions on the appropriate judicialforums for handling such matters. The hearings scheduled for September 4thare anticipated to shed further light on these issues.
