A prominent legal practitioner, known for his representation ofintelligence agencies in the missing persons case, has approached theSupreme Court with a request for an interpretation of the Chief of ArmyStaff’s (COAS) oath and an assessment of their role within the state’saffairs. This legal expert, Raja Irshad, has formally submitted a petitionto the apex court, invoking the authority of Article 184 (3) of theConstitution.
In his petition, Raja Irshad emphasizes that Article 184 (3) of theConstitution is characterized by its open-ended nature, allowing anyaggrieved party to voice and address concerns that pertain to the broadersociety.
He underscores the significance of this petition by asserting that itraises questions of substantial public importance, particularly in thecontext of upholding fundamental rights as outlined in Chapter 1 of Part-IIof the Constitution. This chapter, spanning from Article 8 to 28,enumerates fundamental rights that are deemed indispensable for thePakistani populace to lead honorable and civilized lives, emphasizing theirobservance in both letter and spirit.
Raja Irshad’s legal action underscores a profound interest in ensuring thatthe Chief of Army Staff’s oath aligns with the principles enshrined inPakistan’s Constitution. He seeks to shed light on the pivotal role of theCOAS in the governance of the state, and the potential ramifications ofthis role on the fundamental rights and civil liberties of the people.
Read Top Stories
This legal endeavor exemplifies the enduring pursuit of justice andconstitutional integrity in Pakistan, underscoring the crucial role thatthe judiciary plays in safeguarding the rights and liberties of itscitizens. It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will interpret theCOAS’s oath and its implications for the broader socio-political landscapeof the nation.
