As the Taliban scramble to put up a new governance structure inAfghanistan, analysts reckon that neighboring Pakistan will carry a mixedbag of advantages and challenges under the upcoming regime in the war-torncountry.
They also caution that things could not be as smooth as Pakistan isexpecting from a “friendly” government in Afghanistan as the Taliban’s”medieval ideology” may turn out to be a stalemate, not only for Pakistanbut for the regional countries as well.
“The first and foremost advantage for Pakistan is that it will have agovernment in Afghanistan after decades, which is not inimical to it. It isindeed a great sigh of relief for Islamabad,” retired Lt. Gen. TalatMasood, an Islamabad-based security analyst, said.
Masood foresaw a significant decline in anti-Pakistan activities allegedlycarried out from the Afghan soil during the previous regimes.
Pakistan has long been accusing a “nexus” of Indian and Afghan intelligenceagencies of patronizing the groups involved in cross-border attacks on itssecurity forces.
The former Afghan government had denied the charges and itself accusedPakistan of patronizing the Taliban.
Another positive change, according to Masood who served in the Pakistanarmy from 1952 to 1990, will be strict border control.
“Given a strict discipline within the Taliban ranks, it is quite possiblethat drugs and smuggling activities through Afghanistan border willdecline,” he maintained.
Retired Brig. Mahmood Shah, a Peshawar-based expert on Afghan affairs,opined that the end of the war in the neighborhood is the core event tocelebrate for Islamabad.
“The end of the war in Afghanistan is the biggest advantage for Pakistan.This war had inflicted terrorism on Pakistan. Peace in Afghanistan meanspeace in Pakistan,” Shah stated while referring to over 70,000 casualties,and a colossal loss of more than $100 billion the country suffered sincethe US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.
Also, he added, a significant reduction in Indian influence in Afghanistanfollowing the Taliban takeover, is another gift for Pakistan.
“Nearly $3 billion Indian investment is in clear jeopardy. It does not meanthe doors of Afghanistan have been shut for New Delhi but it wouldcertainly not have the leverage to operate as it did during the previousregime,” he argued.
Although, Pakistan contends it has no favorites in Afghanistan, itsinfluence over the Taliban is viewed as crucial.
It was Pakistan that had arranged rare direct talks between Washington andthe Taliban In December 2018, which led to the Doha peace deal in February2020, and subsequently the withdrawal of foreign troops from the Afghansoil.
Islamabad had also facilitated the landmark first round of direct talksbetween the Afghan government and the Taliban in Pakistan in July 2015.
The process, however, broke down after the news of long-time Taliban leaderMullah Omar’s death surfaced, triggering a bitter internal power struggle.
Former US President Donald Trump in August 2019 stepped up efforts toresume the long-stalled process, seeking Pakistan’s help to endWashington’s longest war in recent history.
Ishtiaq Ahmad, an Islamabad-based expert on international affairs, viewedthat the multi-billion dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), aflagship project of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, can be extended toinclude Afghanistan.
The $64 billion megaproject aims to connect China’s strategic northwesternXinxiang province to the Gwadar seaport through a network of roads,railways, and pipelines to transport cargo, oil, and gas.
Read Top Stories
Despite having a degree of influence over the Taliban, there might be somestinging differences between the Taliban and the regional countries,including Pakistan, the analysts observed.
And the Taliban’s ideology tops the list of possible stalemates.
“Although, Pakistan will have a friendly government in Afghanistan,simultaneously it will be medieval and undemocratic,” Masood thoughtinsisting that the Taliban’s ideology could not be acceptable for a countrylike Pakistan.
“It (ideology) could once again affect Pakistan’s bordering areas as it didduring their first regime in Afghanistan and onwards,” he cautioned.
Pakistan’s northwestern tribal belt, which borders Afghanistan, has longbeen a hotbed of the militant outfits inspired by the Afghan Taliban,forcing the Pakistan army to launch a full-scale offensive in the NorthWaziristan region in 2014.
Since then, the militants loyal to the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP),the mother organization of several militant groups in Pakistan, havereportedly moved to Afghanistan.
Masood said that action against the TTP members operating from Afghanistanwill be the Taliban’s crucial test, considering the fact they had pledgedallegiance to the militia’s founding supreme leader, Mullah Omer.
“Ideologically, there is no major difference between the two. However, theAfghan Taliban have never supported the TTP attacks on the Pakistanisecurity forces and civilians,” he added.
But, he opined, handing over the people who are their ideological allies toPakistan would not be easier for the Taliban.
“Taliban have learned a lot. They know they are in isolation and cannotafford it to linger on. Also, they cannot afford to lose a supporter likePakistan,” he said, contending: “But if they fail to act against the TTP,it will definitely annoy Pakistan, and could lead to lack of confidence andtrust between the two sides.”
After the formation of the government, according to Ahmad, the keychallenge for Pakistan and other regional countries, especially Russia,China, and Iran, will be to ensure that the Taliban strictly comply withtheir commitments on not letting the Afghan soil being used by terrorists,in addition to promises on women and minority rights, freedom of speech andrelations with the world.
According to Brig. Shah, who served as the country’s security chief alongthe tribal belt with Afghanistan from 2002 to 2005, the Taliban are fullycapable of taking action against the TTP.
“Even if the Taliban do not take any action, the TTP will no longer be apotential threat to Pakistan due to shutting off of its funding andlogistic support,” he said, in a thinly-veiled reference to India.
“Pakistan is not totally depending on the Taliban. It itself has takenseveral steps in the recent past, including fencing of the border withAfghanistan, to contain the illegal cross-border movement,” Shah maintained.
Pakistan says it has completed 90% of fencing along the 2,640 kilometers(1,640 miles) porous border with Afghanistan, known as the Durand Line.
Interior Minister Shaikh Rashid Ahmad told reporters on Monday that theTaliban have assured they will not allow any group or individual to actagainst Pakistan from the Afghan soil.
Source: Anadolu Agency
