ISLAMABAD: A recent report from Israel Hayom has revealed that the UnitedArab Emirates, Jordan, and the United Kingdom stand ready to extendcomprehensive logistical and intelligence support to United States militaryoperations should an attack on Iran become necessary. This development,published on January 24 2026, emerges amid heightened regional tensionsfollowing claims of Israeli-assisted evidence against Tehran and ongoingprotests within Iran. The assurance underscores a quiet but firm alignmentamong these nations against perceived Iranian threats, building on patternsof cooperation observed in previous defensive operations.
The Israel Hayom article frames this commitment within a broader context ofpotential US involvement in countering Iran, citing supporters beyondIsrael that include the UAE and European elements, particularly Britain.According to the report, such backing would encompass the full spectrum ofrequired assistance, including intelligence sharing, airspace permissions,and logistical facilitation for US forces. This reported stance aligns withlongstanding regional security dynamics where Sunni-majority states andWestern powers have increasingly coordinated against Iran’s influencethrough proxies and ballistic capabilities.
Historical precedents provide context for this reported readiness. DuringIran’s April 2024 missile and drone assault on Israel, Jordan activelyintercepted projectiles violating its airspace, while the UAE and SaudiArabia reportedly shared critical intelligence with the US and Israel. TheUnited Kingdom contributed through Royal Air Force assets interceptingthreats, demonstrating a precedent for multinational defensive coalitions.Similar patterns recurred in subsequent escalations, highlighting howlogistical and intelligence networks have evolved to counter Iranianlong-range strikes.
Jordan’s strategic position makes its involvement particularly significant.Sharing borders with both Israel and Syria, Amman has consistentlyprioritized safeguarding its territory from spillover effects of regionalconflicts. Past cooperation, including allowing allied aircraft to operatein its airspace during defensive intercepts, reflects a pragmatic approachto national security. Despite domestic sensitivities regarding relationswith Israel, Jordan’s military ties with the US remain robust, facilitatedthrough joint exercises and basing arrangements that could extend tobroader contingencies.
The United Arab Emirates has deepened its alignment with Western securityarchitectures since the Abraham Accords normalized ties with Israel in2020. Hosting advanced US air assets at Al Dhafra Air Base, the UAE haspositioned itself as a key logistical hub in the Gulf. Reports indicatethat Emirati intelligence contributions have proven vital in priorincidents, underscoring Abu Dhabi’s interest in containing Iranian maritimeand proxy threats that could disrupt vital shipping lanes like the Straitof Hormuz.
Britain’s reported role adds a transatlantic dimension to this potentialsupport framework. With historical military presence in the region,including deployments to Cyprus and recent reinforcements, the UK maintainscapabilities for intelligence gathering and air operations. Its involvementwould likely emphasize defensive postures and allied coordination ratherthan direct offensive engagement, consistent with London’s approach inprevious Middle East crises. This European participation reflects broaderNATO-aligned concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions and regionaldestabilization efforts.
The timing of the Israel Hayom disclosure coincides with intensified USmilitary posturing in the Middle East. Recent movements include deploymentsof fighter aircraft to Jordanian bases, increased naval assets in thePersian Gulf, and logistical buildup signals detected through open-sourcemonitoring. These preparations appear linked to assessments of Iranianvulnerabilities amid internal unrest and external pressures, thoughofficial US statements have not confirmed any imminent offensive plans.
Read Top Stories
No public confirmations or denials have emerged from the governments of theUAE, Jordan, or the UK regarding the specific commitments outlined in thereport. Such arrangements typically remain classified due to diplomatic andsecurity considerations. Past experiences show that Arab states often frametheir cooperation as defensive measures to protect sovereignty rather thanexplicit endorsements of offensive actions against Iran.
Analysts note that any US-led operation against Iran would face formidablechallenges, including Iran’s asymmetric warfare capabilities, proxynetworks across the region, and potential disruptions to global energymarkets. The reported support from these nations could mitigate somelogistical hurdles but would not eliminate risks of escalation involvingmultiple fronts. Regional stability hinges on careful calibration to avoidbroader confrontation.
This reported alignment reflects evolving geopolitical realities in theMiddle East, where shared interests in countering Iranian expansion havefostered unprecedented, albeit discreet, cooperation. As tensions persist,the extent of such support in any future contingency will likely depend onthe specific triggers and international diplomatic efforts to de-escalate.
Source:https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/01/24/us-obtained-smoking-gun-evidence-against-iran-with-israeli-help
ogimageimage-name