ISLAMABAD: India’s recent decision to scale back its operationalinvolvement in Iran’s Chabahar Port, driven by renewed US sanctionspressures, has inadvertently delivered significant strategic benefits toPakistan. As New Delhi completes its financial commitments and winds downdirect managerial presence at the facility, Afghanistan faces diminishedalternative trade routes, reinforcing reliance on Pakistani infrastructure.This shift not only diminishes a long-standing counter to Pakistan’s portsbut also reduces potential avenues for regional instability linked toexternal influences.
The Chabahar Port project, initiated through tripartite agreementsinvolving India, Iran, and Afghanistan, aimed to provide landlocked Kabulwith direct access to the Indian Ocean, bypassing Pakistan’s Karachi andGwadar facilities. India invested substantially, including a $120 milliongrant and operational control over the Shahid Beheshti terminal under a10-year pact, positioning the port as a gateway for trade with Afghanistanand Central Asia. However, escalating US sanctions on Iran, including therevocation of exemptions effective late 2025 and a conditional waiverexpiring in April 2026, compelled India to recalibrate its engagement toavoid secondary penalties.
Recent developments indicate that India has transferred funds to fulfillcommitments ahead of deadlines, effectively limiting exposure whilepreserving nominal strategic interests. Reports from credible sourceshighlight that while India denies a full exit and continues engagementswith Washington, active involvement has been reduced, including managerialoversight. This adjustment stems from broader geopolitical pressures,including threats of additional tariffs on entities dealing with Tehranunder the current US administration.
For Afghanistan, the implications prove particularly challenging. TheTaliban-led government had viewed Chabahar as a vital economic lifeline,especially amid periodic border tensions with Pakistan that disrupttransit. With India’s scaled-back role, Kabul’s options for diversifiedtrade shrink considerably, as the port’s full potential remains unrealizeddue to incomplete rail links and sanctions constraints. Consequently,Afghanistan reverts toward greater dependence on Pakistan’s more efficientand geographically proximate routes, including highways and ports thathandle the bulk of its external commerce.
This realignment offers Pakistan notable economic advantages. EnhancedAfghan transit traffic through Pakistani territory boosts revenues fromcustoms, logistics, and infrastructure usage. Karachi and Gwadar portsstand to gain increased volumes, supporting broader economic corridors likethe China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Analysts note that the route viaPakistan remains 40-45 percent more cost-effective than alternativesthrough Chabahar, reinforcing natural geographic superiority and commercialviability.
On the security front, India’s diminished footprint at Chabahar mitigateslong-held Pakistani concerns over potential intelligence or proxyactivities near sensitive borders. Chabahar’s proximity to Balochistan hadraised apprehensions about external monitoring or destabilization efforts,particularly given historical allegations of espionage. A reduced Indianpresence eases these pressures, potentially lowering cross-border tensionsand allowing Pakistan to focus resources on internal stability andcounterterrorism along the Afghan frontier.
Moreover, the development curtails a strategic encirclement narrative thathad animated regional rivalries. Chabahar was often framed as acounterweight to Gwadar, aiming to dilute Pakistan’s influence over Afghanconnectivity. With India’s retreat, Pakistan consolidates its position asthe primary conduit for Afghanistan’s global trade, fostering opportunitiesfor improved bilateral economic ties and dialogue on mutual securityconcerns, including curbing terrorism outflows.
Read Top Stories
Pakistan’s ports and transit systems now face less competitive pressure,enabling sustained investments in infrastructure upgrades. This couldtranslate into higher trade volumes, job creation in logistics sectors, andstrengthened regional economic integration. Experts emphasize thatgeography continues to favor Pakistan, with shorter distances andestablished networks providing inherent advantages over sanctioned orunderdeveloped alternatives.
The broader regional dynamics underscore how external sanctionsinadvertently reshape alliances and dependencies. While India seeks tosafeguard residual interests through negotiations, the immediate outcometilts the balance toward Pakistan. Afghanistan’s constrained choices mayencourage more pragmatic engagement with Islamabad, potentially reducingfriction over border management and trade protocols.
In summary, India’s strategic recalibration at Chabahar, though driven byexternal compulsions, inadvertently confers Pakistan a dual blessing:diminished security risks from rival involvement and amplified economicleverage through reinforced Afghan dependence. This evolution highlightsthe enduring role of geography and sanctions in determining South and WestAsian connectivity outcomes.
ogimageimage-name