In the case against the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act, Chief Justice Justice Faez Isa referred to the case of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, saying that mistakes were made by the judges, and we should acknowledge that our honor is at stake.
We have examined the Martial Law Proclamation, and Article 184 also concerns public opinion about its misuse. The three-member bench had declared the record agreements null and void. Chief Justice of Pakistan said that after the record case, the country was fined 6.5 billion rupees, which was the judges' thinking and it was not correct.
Yes, we also make mistakes, there were mistakes in Zulfikar Bhutto's case too. Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awais, in the case against the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act, argued that these petitions are not maintainable. As far as the independence of the judiciary is concerned, under the Government of India Act, the judiciary used to make laws with the approval of the judiciary governor-general.
Under the Constitution of Pakistan 1956, the judiciary's regulations were subject to the president's approval. The law is only about one oath. Transparency in institutions will come through the law. Justice Manib Akhtar said that the freedom of the judiciary is mentioned in the 1973 Constitution. The Attorney General said that this law is for resolving important issues of the people. All powers are vested in this court through the law, it is true that the freedom of the judiciary is related to every citizen.