ISLAMABAD –Nawaz Sharif, Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Capt (retd) Safdarhave responded over the SC notice over NAB appeal.
Trio on Saturday submitted their replies in Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC)on appeal of National Accountability Bureau (NAB) challenging suspension ofSharifs’ jail sentences in Avenfield reference.
The replies state that verdict of Islamabad High Court (IHC) is based onfacts. The replies further read that trial court—in its verdict—did notkeep the facts in view before arriving on conclusion hence the decision ofIHC should be upheld.
The reply of Nawaz Sharif states that he had been declared owner of Londonflats without producing evidence whereas the conclusion was drawn thatSharif’s sons had bought London flats when they were dependent on theirfather. It further adds that NAB had not even produced evidence pertainingto dependency of sons on their fathers.
Read Top Stories
The replies further states that NAB had not submitted evidence pertainingto price of flats bought during 1993 to 1996.
