India perturbed as 29 heads of state land in Beijing for Silk Road initiative
Shares
NEW DELHI: India is likely to be represented by local embassy staff or academics this weekend at a major gathering of leaders and ministers on China’s “Silk Road” initiative, reflecting deep unease in New Delhi about the far-reaching project.
India’s main objection to China’s plan to build ports, railways and power links across Asia and on to Europe is that the $57 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a key part of the plan, runs through disputed Kashmir.
The broader worry for India is that the “Belt and Road” initiative involving hundreds of billions of dollars over the coming decades will cement China’s dominance over Asia, including India’s neighbourhood.
Leaders of 29 countries plus senior delegates from other nations gather in Beijing for a two-day summit starting on Sunday to map out a project that is seen as broad on ambition but short on specifics.
Even Vietnam, which has had rocky ties with China, will be represented by its president, while Japan, driving its own infrastructure push across Asia, is sending a deputy trade minister and the secretary-general of the ruling party.
India, meanwhile, is expected to send representatives from its embassy in Beijing, two Indian officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang said that, as far as he knew, Indian academics would be participating in “relevant activities” at the Belt and Road Forum. He gave no other details and offered no further comment.
Indian foreign ministry spokesperson Gopal Baglay said no decision had been taken on whether an Indian government delegation would attend the meeting.
“The matter is under consideration,” he said, a position the government has maintained since March when China extended an invitation. Since then it has stepped up efforts to get India to attend.
China says Silk Road plan is not tied to presidency
Baglay said India supported connectivity across the region, but there was a problem with the Pakistan end of “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) – a term widely used to describe the project.
“As far as OBOR is concerned, you know that our position is that since the so-called CPEC forms a part of OBOR that is where our difficulty is.
“It passes or proposes to pass through what is sovereign Indian territory and we have made our views in this regard very, very clear to the Chinese side.”
