Pakistan strongly oppose Indian formula on UNSC expansion

Pakistan strongly oppose Indian formula on UNSC expansion
Shares

UNITED NATIONS - Pakistan, which firmly opposes additional permanent members on the U.N. Security Council, has called for equitable representation on the 15-member body by adding more elected seats to it.

Speaking in the long-running Intergovernmental Negotiations on Security Council reform, Pakistan’s Ambassador to the UN, Maleeha Lodhi , said that equitable “representation” has been the primary impulse behind all Security Council reform efforts, and its importance cannot be over-stated.

“In 1945, the Security Council represented 20% of the membership of the UN; today, it represents 8% of the membership”, she asserted, also pointing out that nearly a third of the membership has never served on the Council.

Full-scale negotiations to restructure the Security Council began in the General Assembly in February 2009 on five key areas “categories of membership, the question of veto, regional representation, size of an enlarged Council, and working methods of the body and its relationship with the 193-member Assembly.

Despite a general agreement on enlarging the Council, as part of the UN reform process, member states remain sharply divided over the details.

Known as the “Group of Four” — India, Brazil, Germany and Japan — have shown no flexibility in their campaign for expanding the Security Council by 10 seats, with 6 additional permanent and four non-permanent members. On the other hand, Italy/Pakistan-led Uniting for Consensus (UfC) group say that additional permanent members will not make the Security Council more effective. As a compromise, UfC has proposed a new category of members — not permanent members — with longer duration in terms and a possibility to get re-elected once.

Arguing that representativeness and accountability were two sides of the same coin, Ambassador Lodhi said, the greater the accountability, the better the representativeness and added that one cannot co-exist without the other.

“Applied in the context of the Security Council, it is evident that these conditions cannot be met by an expansion in the permanent category”, the Pakistani envoy stressed. “This is acknowledged by UN charter itself, wherein permanent members are identified by name without creating any pretense of regional or equitable distribution”, she argued.

Criticizing the Group of Four position, Ambassador Lodhi said, “Without prejudice to the Common African Position for representation on behalf of an entire region, we are at a loss to understand how proposals that seek to promote the national aspirations of some member states, can enhance the representative nature of the Security Council, when the region in question, has neither bestowed that privilege on them, nor does it enjoy the right to hold them to account”.

On the other hand, she said, it is the non-permanent category where the elements of equitable representation are embedded; elections and geographical distribution in article 23(1) of the UN Charter, and a specific term with rotation in article 23(2). Separate these two articles and the concept of representation goes out of the window, she said. In conclusion, Ambassador Lodhi expressed Pakistan’s commitment to constructive and meaningful engagement in carrying forward this process.

But, she said, the process itself has to be a membership-driven one. She urged the chair to ensure that the process remains on a consensual and inclusive path to achieve the progress everyone wants to see. - APP

Foreign Policy