Why Nawaz Sharif’s lawyer has refused to proceed further in Accountability Court cases?
Shares
ISLAMABAD - Nawaz Sharif’s counsel Khawaja Haris on Monday refused to proceed further in the case until an application before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) - challenging the accountability court judge’s move to allegedly change a witness statement during cross-examination - is resolved.
The accountability court Judge Arshad Malik subsequently adjourned the hearing of the Al-Azizia and Hill Metal Establishment reference till September 4 after the former PM’s counsel informed the court regarding the pending IHC application.
Haris stated that IHC had issued a notice to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) for September 4 and he could not continue cross-examination until his application is decided.
The judge suggested to leave the disputed portion and continue cross-examination, but Nawaz’s counsel declined and said that he had cooperated in a similar manner previously and it had affected IHC proceedings.
During the last hearing, Haris had accused Judge Arshad of “record tampering” while cross-examining the JIT head in the Al-Azizia reference. Haris had alleged that Judge Malik changed Zia’s statement on the insistence of NAB’s Deputy Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi without providing his client with an opportunity to contest the prosecutor’s assertions.
Several prominent leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), including former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Punjab governor Rafique Rajwana and Pervaiz Rashid were present in the courtroom.